Yes, Armorican. Not “American.” We’ll get to that in a bit.
A very interesting article came across my desk today, as I was waking up and having my morning coffee. This article was published by none other than the very knowledgeable
, and it’s about the demographic changes in North America.In this article, Stark discusses the meme of “Castiza Futurism.” To put it short:
Castizo Futurism is used to describe the blending of Whites and Latinos to form a new ethnogenesis, as well as a rightward political shift among Latinos. A liberal publication describes Castizo Futurism as multiracial White Nationalism, as a lot of young White nationalist men aren’t actually White, with prominent dissident right figure, Nick Fuentes, having Latino ancestry. While many on the Right embrace Castizo Futurism, it is also used derisively by Alt-Right types. The embrace of Castizo Futurism signifies some degree of White demoralization.
Whiteshift author, Eric Kaufman, predicts that many minorities, especially Latinos will be absorbed into Whiteness just like Italians, Jews, and Irish were, though not Black people. Kaufman being half Jewish, a quarter Asian and a quarter Latino though White presenting, is a product of this. Thus Kaufman seems fine with this Whiteshift coinciding with civic nationalism based on preserving Western values. He just opposes any overt forms of White identity politics.
As Stark points out, Kaufmann is himself a Londoner, half-Jewish, a quarter Asian and a quarter Latino, but White-passing. Suffice it to say, he’s someone who only feels at home with English-speaking, internationally mixed individuals of varied ethnicity. Kaufmann, naturally, would support this endeavour. Yet, against Kaufmann’s 'Whiteshift,' Michael Lind, another intellectual, suggests instead a directed, top-down deliberate integration to create a new American race and culture. Lind believes this is the only way to save the contiguous United States, or it will balkanize along ethnic and racial lines due to instability from socioeconomic pressures (such as mass immigration). Stark goes on to differentiate the two. One of them involves incorporating White-passing and White-identifying Hispanics into the current White American body, while Lind advocates essentially the abolishment of all races (most of all whiteness), for the convergence leading to ethnogenesis of a new people entirely.
Neither of these, for obvious reasons, are desirable situations for the identity-conscious in North America. Lind’s idea is the least likely of the two to occur, specifically because, even today with the highest number of mixed-race individuals alive, and with a titanic corporate-media-industrial-complex producing pro-interracial entertainment to encourage mixing, actual dating and marriage statistics suggest the majority of people tend to stick with their own, for whatever reason. You can call it racism, you can call it in-group preference, simple familiarity, or all of the above, most people of all categories just won’t do it. Some groups are more likely than others to mix, and others less so, but the majority across the board do not.
Stark continues:
The incompatibility is that Castizo Futurism is based on assimilation while enclavism is fundamentally against assimilation and mass miscegenation. The fundamental question is whether Americanism can be preserved while retaining a strong White core. While White populism is bound to fail, I foresee either a multi-racial working class populist coalition or Whites becoming an elitist diaspora.
A Side Note
Frankly, I agree with Stark. This is a separate subject entirely, but let me go off on a tangent for a moment. I’m skeptical that White Americans in particular can unite through “White Populism.” Race is the largest, macro-scale identifier that only semi-unites people in the face of aliens who are so foreign as to encourage cooperation. It is not a deep identity in and of itself because “White” basically means the entire Western world, with its some 70-odd nations worldwide. African Americans notoriously quarrel with African immigrants, and even Afro-Caribbeans when the black race are the only people around. White Americans are ethnically different across the country, and there is hardly a discernible consistent ethnicity. Appalachia is predominantly Scots-Irish. The Midwest is mostly German and Scandinavian. Northern New England and Utah are mostly of the British Isles, especially English. Massive swathes of New York and New Jersey are Italian-American. Huge numbers of Slavs moved to Illinois. Some American nationalists will say that America’s ethnicity is a work-in-progress, but that doesn’t help White Americans here and now.
White populist organizations seemed to have completely failed in their mission going back to the 1960s. White Americans, who are American nationalists, seem lost with no sense of identity. George Lincoln Rockwell, despite speaking the truth on a great many subjects, in the context of his time was the equivilent of an Afghanistan war veteran returning to the United States, converting to Islam, declaring the superiority of Afghan culture, and forming a movement around the superiority of ISIS. Many role-play online as Confederate soldiers, Germans, IRA members, or Italians, adding three flags in their Twitter bios. This lack of identity is one of White Americans' biggest weaknesses. In the 1860s, the United States government flooded the country with random European immigrants to repopulate the brutal, horrific, and tragic loss of hundreds of thousands of Anglo-Americans in the American Civil War. These immigrants, even one hundred years later, were still referred to as “white ethnics,” by the dwindled WASP elite until John F. Kennedy. The vast majority of these white ethnics voted Democrat until recently. The Anglo-American ethnic majority was reduced and diluted. The recognition and self-awareness of the United States as an Anglo country, with English common law and a constitution based on the traditional rights of Anglo-Saxon Yeoman or “Free Man” was lost in public consciousness.
The communities of white ethnics, such as the Irish, Italians, Poles, and others, were also themselves destroyed, deracinated, and assimilated after the Second World War, following the great push out of the cities into the suburbs. The result is a mass of “White Americans,” who are presumably mostly a mix of British and German, with sprinklings of random European ethnicities, held together by an invisible, watered-down essence of a once Anglo-Saxon culture taken for granted, and now long forgotten. Indeed, all American groups have some Anglo blood, no matter if they’re Kraut McBastards or Wop Polacks. Even if they don’t, they speak English, and their culture is nominally Anglo. If you don’t believe me, if you think that’s not true and you’re more Italian than Italian, more German than German, why don’t you book a flight to Europe and ask them what the age of consent is in Italy or Germany. You will realize just how Anglo you are.
I am not American. Being Canadian, I’m a foreigner, but familiar. Inside the American corpus but not of it, like a barbarous Macedonian overlooking the Greek city-states. In my view, the success and popularity of a group such as Patriot Front is largely due to their targeted usage of old-stock, Anglo-American iconography and symbolism of a foundational America that has been long forgotten. The only other right-wing group to achieve mass popularity of this sort was through William Dudley Pelley. At its peak, this organization, with 30,000 members, called the “Silver Shirts,” allegedly was sponsored by Anglo-Americans Walt Disney and Henry Ford. I would argue the collective failures of previous right-wing American nationalist groups, such as TRS, NJP, Blood Tribe, Vanguard America, the German American Bund, Neo-Nazi organizations like the Aryan Brotherhood or Hammerskin Nation, are explicitly due to this lack of coherent, shared ethnic identity. Race is simply not enough.
Patriot Front seems to stoke in people nascent cultural memories, and you might even say genetic memory. Imagery of minutemen, tricorn hats, the golden fasces in Congress, and Green Mountain. George Washington-Zeus dining with the Olympians in Heaven. Statues of the founders, pioneers, heroes, and ministers dot the nation, quietly standing alone in the oldest regions of the country, full of dirt, dust, and moss. Artifacts of the blood of Lady Columbia and her people. They likely don’t remember that beautiful Athenian at all. This is the true American nation that must be rediscovered, or a new mythology recognizing the shared history of Americans as a people must b formed, such as what J.D. Vance said to the chagrin of Ben Shapiro.
Returning to Stark’s Insights
Robert proves his knowledge on the subject by invoking Brazil:
However, an example of these seemingly contradictory models coexisting is Brazil, where there are White enclaves with people of German, Italian, or Portuguese ancestry, but also enclaves of lighter skin Pardos (mixed race people) aspiring to Whiteness as a sign of upper mobility and supporting Bolsonaro. Brazil has a lot of mixing but also this elite core of Whites who do not mix. I could see a scenario where the foundation of America’s Right is an alliance of Castizos in law enforcement, the military, and the petite bourgeoisie in alliance with an ethnocentric White elite.
This may be an uncomfortable reality to some, but this is indeed how Latin America operates. Liberal beliefs that mass racial and ethnic mixing will lead to the end of discrimination, racism, or bigotry are completely delusional. Not only do most people not mix, but there are also parallel groups of insular, homogeneous, and aggressively identity-politics-based demographics. There is no place more conscious of racial and ethnic identity than Latin America. On that continent, the middle class is mixed, but predominantly European, with some 60-80% of their genetic makeup being Iberian (Spanish or Portuguese). They’re in alliance with elites, who are ethnically homogeneous enclaves of pure Whites and just numerous enough to keep the lights on. We may see, due to socioeconomic pressures, an emergent White American lower-middle and middle class intermarrying with White-passing and predominantly white Latin Americans. Latin America is culturally quasi-Western, it is overwhelmingly Catholic, and a significant chunk of its population is majority White. If not for these variables, integration and assimilation would be unlikely, if it is to happen at all.
However, the maintenance of stability in the United States, and the integration of White-passing Latinos may indeed come at a not insignificant cost — as reports suggest, demographic change is a significant threat to scientific innovation. Some degree of intermixing is tolerable, but once a certain threshold has passed where a chunk of the population shifts to an off-white majority, innovation slows and stops.
says:There are 190 Million Whites in Latin America, but most of these Whites are now 20 - 30% non-White and so whatever potential these bloodlines may have had for the scientific achievement Whites show nearly everywhere else is basically dead. The continent, as a source of scientific innovation is dead. Ok, no that’s not true, there are cool natural resources to be studied there. Anglo-Whites all over the world who almost never reproduced with Natives, thrive at levels comparable to or exceeding home. But White Latin America is a museum piece.
The Latin American prize winners seem to be predominantly or exclusively, of European extraction in their continent.
The North American Redoubt
I’ve demonstrated that there is a real possibility of demographic shifts in the United States. What we haven’t explored yet are the demographic shifts in North America as a whole. Let’s turn to Canada for a moment. As stated earlier, for the identity-conscious for whom race is not enough but ethnicity is, the off-white transformation of North America is undesirable. I count myself in the camp of ethnic enclave, as an old-stock ethnic Canadian of 17 generations, an English-speaking Quebecer of both Anglo-Canadian and Québécois ancestry (Anglo-Québécois).
Canada is unique in North America in that it is a homogeneous nation-state. Its population of White people underwent ethnogenesis centuries ago. The English, Scottish, and Irish converged into the new, North American ethnicity of Anglo-Canadians. The Norman and Breton converged similarly into Québécois. However, as of 2026, what is clear is that the Eastern Canadian provinces of Quebec, New Brunswick, PEI, Newfoundland & Labrador, and Nova Scotia will retain not just a White majority, but an ethnic Canadian majority. Ontario hangs in the balance, of ethnic Canadian Loyalists at 51%. Nontheless, this marks a majority of Anglo-Canadians and Québécois, in the oldest, most deeply rooted areas of the country. Their settlement at the earliest dates back to 1497 and 1532 respectively.
New England is the birthplace of the United States of America. The oldest settlement is Plymouth, Massachusetts, established in 1620 by Pilgrims on board the Mayflower. Today, its European-American population is estimated at 83.4%, but this includes English, Irish, Italian, and French (from Quebec and Acadia). Let us reduce the recent European immigration. This leaves us with 71.1% of New England as Anglo-Irish, the British Isles majority of the American Northeast.
Why does this matter? If you believe that ethnos drives ethos, the North American Northeast represents the oldest, most deeply rooted regions of Canada and the United States, not just racially, but ethnically. It is here where the countries, cultures, and great feats of both nations actually started, and where they will remain the most homogeneous even in the face of great change going into the next few decades. Juxtaposed to the plausible emergence of a Castizo mass in the American South and Southwest, it will be the North American Northeast, where civilization first started, that remains the purest. Anglo-Canadians, Anglo-Americans, and Québécois are the three founding cultures and ethnic groups responsible for the North American branch of all Western civilization on this continent.
Armorica
I can’t help but think of Armorica in 476 A.D., the year the Western Roman Empire collapsed and this little Gallic peninsula of Armorica. The Armoricans were a Celtic tribe, remote and traditional, in the far northwestern corner of what is now France. Armorica maintained the last remnants of both Celtic and Greco-Roman paganism and cultural traditions, but they synthesized these with the recently arriving Christians. Britannia (modern England) would be invaded by the Anglo-Saxons. The province of Gaul (modern France) would similarly be invaded by the Franks. Thousands of Brythonic Celts would flee the island of Britain for Armorica. The synthesis of the Armorican peoples with the refugee Brythonic peoples led to the ethnogenesis of the people we now know as Bretons.
Brittany (Bretagne, literal translation of Britain) maintained its independence as a sovereign entity for a significant period. The region first established a unified kingdom under King Erispoë in 851. Despite facing various challenges, Brittany remained a sovereign duchy from 939. This period of independence lasted until 1532, when the Duchy of Brittany was finally united with the Kingdom of France.
This analogy isn’t set in stone, and neither is the off-whitification of America, but should it happen, let this be a glimmer of hope and light.
It will not be over for another 1000 years.
Funny enough, it was the Breton Jacques Cartier who first discovered Canada. Maybe that could tie it all together somehow, but nothing comes to mind for me right now. And holy shit those white percentage projections are completely insane, I had no idea things were that bad in the west.
Interesting piece but you should fix some mistakes. "Their settlement at the earliest dates back to 1497 and 1532 respectively." Neither of these dates are correct. Yes, John Cabot (real name Giovanni Caboto) discovered Newfoundland in 1497, but the first attempt at colonization wasn't until the early 17th century. And by 1532 you must mean 1534 since that was the year of Jacques Carter's first voyage to what is now Canada. But though Cartier did make an attempt at colonization on his third trip in 1541, by 1542 all the colonists who had survived the winter returned to France. It wasn't until Samuel de Champlain's founding of Quebec in 1608 that permanent European colonization of what is now Canada began.